SynthesisFrontiers in neurology
Efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for cognitive impairment in patients with traumatic brain injury: a network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Non-pharmacological interventions may improve cognitive function in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI); however, their comparative effectiveness and clinical prioritization remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate multiple non-pharmacological interventions using a network meta-analysis and to assess the certainty of evidence while identifying existing research gaps. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were systematically searched in English and Chinese databases up to August 15, 2025. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 1.0). A network meta-analysis was conducted using R to compare intervention effects on Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Modified Barthel Index (MBI). Evidence quality was assessed using the GRADE framework. Results: Nine RCTs involving 528 participants and eight non-pharmacological interventions were included. The evidence network was sparse, with most comparisons informed by single studies. Music therapy showed a potential benefit in improving MMSE scores. Comprehensive nursing intervention demonstrated a possible advantage in MoCA outcomes. Electroacupuncture combined with hyperbaric oxygen therapy showed a positive trend in improving MBI scores. However, effect estimates were imprecise, and overall evidence certainty was low or very low. Conclusion: Current evidence suggests that several non-pharmacological interventions may offer potential benefits for cognitive and functional recovery in TBI patients; however, findings are highly uncertain and insufficient to support clinical prioritization. This study highlights important evidence gaps, and further large-scale, high-quality RCTs are needed to establish reliable comparative effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.