ArticleNucleic acids research2026
A nanogram-sensitive workflow for oligonucleotide mass spectrometry using ion-pair-free nanoflow HILIC and RNase benchmarking.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
RNA modifications regulate diverse cellular processes, yet comprehensive characterization of modified RNA sequences remains technically challenging. Mass spectrometry provides direct chemical information on RNA, but current oligonucleotide-based workflows typically require micrograms of RNA input and often rely on ion-pairing reagents for chromatographic separation, limiting their applicability to scarce or native RNA samples. Here, we establish a sensitive oligonucleotide mass spectrometry workflow that combines ion-pair-free nanoflow hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography with systematic benchmarking of controlled RNA cleavage strategies. We compared RNase T1, RNase 4, and colicin E5 and evaluated how reaction conditions influence cleavage specificity, fragment length distribution, and terminal chemistries of RNA hydrolysates. The resulting workflow enables robust LC-MS/MS analysis using standard MS-compatible buffers and supports confident oligonucleotide identification through NucleicAcidSearchEngine (NASE) database searching. Using this approach, we achieved high sequence coverage from nanogram-scale RNA inputs, enabling modification analysis of 25-50 ng native yeast tRNAPhe and sequence verification of 250 ng synthetic mRNA. Together, this work establishes a sensitive and broadly applicable platform for oligonucleotide mass spectrometry and provides practical guidance for RNase selection and digestion strategies. The method expands the applicability of RNA MS to low-input samples and supports future studies of RNA sequence and modification landscapes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.