ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2026
Innovative Educational Technologies in Undergraduate Mental Health Nursing Education: A Scoping Review.
Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mental health nursing requires specialised training in therapeutic communication and related soft skills. Innovative, digitally enhanced strategies may support competency development, particularly amid clinical placement shortages. This article outlines insights from a scoping review of technology use in undergraduate mental health nursing education. The objectives were to (a) explore the impact of using these technologies in students' experience and (b) develop insights that can contribute to the development of a curriculum that embed innovative educational technology with strong theoretical foundations and pedagogical strategies. This review was guided by the modified Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework. The PCC (Population, Concept, Context) framework was used to formulate the eligibility criteria. A review protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework (OSF). The databases for searching included CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus, PsycINFO, Web of Science. The results were reported according to the PRISMA-ScR checklist. The review included 35 studies and the evidence showed that, virtual reality simulations (VRS) with varying immersive abilities were the most popular innovative educational technology used in undergraduate mental health nursing education. Interestingly, no articles were identified that used other innovative educational technologies as outlined in the search strategies. Both immersive and non-immersive VRS were equally effective in improving student learning experiences compared to traditional learning modalities. The main benefits included enhanced learning experiences and comprehension and the development of necessary skills and confidence before entering clinical settings. Advanced technologies offer future-focused benefits for mental health nursing education; however, core therapeutic skills remain essential. Virtual learning should therefore complement, not replace, realistic learning experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.