Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42444566›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2026

Imminent fracture risk: contributing mechanisms, risk assessment, and implications for treatment.

Tatiane Vilaca, Richard Eastell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tatiane VilacaSchool of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2RX, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9227-6076
Richard EastellSchool of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2RX, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0323-3366

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying imminent fracture risk is a critical opportunity to manage osteoporosis. This term refers to the sharply elevated probability of sustaining a subsequent fragility fracture within a determined period-typically 12 to 24 months-after an initial sentinel fracture. While a prior fracture is widely recognized as a primary predictor of future events, epidemiological data show that this risk is not uniform; rather, it peaks significantly within the first 3 to 6 months after injury. This review discusses a significant clinical gap: traditional assessment tools often focus on long-term, 10-year risk projections, which may delay treatment during this high-vulnerability period. Recognizing imminent risk highlights clinical urgency, indicating the need for early use of therapeutic interventions to rapidly reduce the risk of further fractures. Identifying patients at imminent risk offers an opportunity for secondary prevention, promoting immediate pharmacological action to interrupt the "fracture cascade" and enhance long-term skeletal health.

Indexed as

Fractures, BoneOsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesHumansRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSecondary Preventionfracturefracture riskimminent fracture riskosteoporosissecondary fracture prevention

Identifiers

PMID42444566
PMCPMC13671776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.