Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42444537›Full record

SynthesisJournal of clinical nursing2026

Effectiveness of Family-Focused End of Life and Bereavement Interventions Across Neonatal, Paediatric, and Adult Intensive Care: An Overview of Reviews.

Melissa Riegel, Kristen Ranse, Ashleigh E Butler, Kanchana Ekanayake, Thomas Buckley

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of clinical nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Melissa RiegelSusan Wakil School of Nursing & Midwifery, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6738-8578
Kristen RanseCancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0196-9529
Ashleigh E ButlerSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8682-2854
Kanchana EkanayakeSusan Wakil School of Nursing & Midwifery, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4324-311X
Thomas BuckleySusan Wakil School of Nursing & Midwifery, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1902-9113

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntensive Care Units (ICUs) care for critically ill patients across all age groups, with many deaths occurring during or shortly after admission. For families, this can be associated with significant psychological distress, including prolonged grief, depression, and post-traumatic stress. Family experiences are influenced by the quality of end-of-life communication, involvement in decision-making, and the availability of bereavement support. Despite this, bereavement care across neonatal, paediatric, and adult ICUs remains inconsistent, highlighting the need for evidence-based strategies.

objectiveTo identify, summarise, and report the effectiveness and impact of end-of-life and bereavement interventions delivered by ICU staff on family psychological, social, and physiological outcomes.

designOverview of reviews. SETTING(S): Neonatal, paediatric, and adult ICUs internationally.

methodsA comprehensive search (PROSPERO CRD42024581827) was conducted across Medline, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, and PsycINFO, with an updated search in 2025. Screening was completed by two research team members. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBIS. Data were extracted as reported in each systematic review and analysed narratively.

resultsFifteen systematic reviews (145 primary studies) were included across neonatal (n = 4), paediatric (n = 1), adult (n = 9), and mixed settings. Interventions were diverse and often multi-component. Communication-focused strategies that were timely, honest, and individualised were associated with improved family satisfaction and perceptions of care. Opportunities for family presence, shared decision-making, and relational nursing support were reported as central to understanding, acceptance, and adjustment. Memory making and bereavement follow-up were valued, though impacts on psychological outcomes varied. Evidence was limited by inconsistent outcome measures and minimal paediatric-specific reviews.

conclusionsICU family-focused end-of-life and bereavement interventions can provide meaningful support, but effectiveness is difficult to determine due to inconsistent implementation and methodological variation. Findings highlight the importance of individualised and relational approaches, and suggest culturally responsive care may influence how interventions are experienced.

Indexed as

BereavementFamilyIntensive Care UnitsTerminal CareAdultChildFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalebereavementcritical careend of lifenursingoverview of reviewspatient and family‐centered careumbrella review

Identifiers

PMID42444537
PMCPMC13629259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.