Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42444534›Full record

ArticleVeterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association2026

Clinically Relevant Motion of Canine Thoracic Tumors Is Seen Between Inspiratory and Expiratory Breath Holds on Computed Tomography Performed for Radiation Treatment Planning.

Carolynne R Kruckman-Gatesy, Susan M LaRue, Lynn R Griffin, Mary-Keara Boss, Gregg Griffenhagen, Sangeeta Rao, Cory N Wakamatsu, Del Leary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Carolynne R Kruckman-GatesyDepartment of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Susan M LaRueDepartment of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Lynn R GriffinDepartment of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Mary-Keara BossDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7239-4502
Gregg GriffenhagenDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3522-5587
Sangeeta RaoDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9234-0082
Cory N WakamatsuDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Del LearyDepartment of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.

Funding

Colorado State University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancements in radiation therapy allow for targeting smaller tumor volumes with exceedingly conformal precision. Target motion during the breathing cycle needs to be anticipated. To date, no information exists that characterizes the motion of canine thoracic tumors during the respiratory cycle. The primary purpose of this study is to assess the pattern of motion of thoracic tumors in three-dimensional (3D) space between inspiratory and expiratory breath holds as a surrogate measurement of the breathing cycle. A secondary aim is to evaluate whether tumor position within the thorax relates to the degree of motion. Fourteen dogs were prospectively enrolled and received thoracic computed tomography (CT) scans with pre- and post-contrast inspiratory and expiratory phases achieved via manual breath holds. Gross tumor volume (GTV) and normal structures were delineated on inspiratory and expiratory image sets, and shifts were measured and analyzed. Smaller tumors had more motion in the dorsoventral direction compared to larger tumors (p = 0.047; rs = -0.44). The same observation was appreciated in the craniocaudal direction (p = 0.008; rs = -0.56). Dogs with multiple tumors had more motion in the dorsoventral direction and the craniocaudal direction compared to dogs with solitary tumors (p = 0.035; p = 0.022). Caudal tumors had significantly more 3D motion (p < 0.001) and craniocaudal motion (p < 0.001) compared to cranial tumors, whereas there was significantly more lateral motion (p < 0.001) between peripheral and central tumors, but no significant difference in 3D motion (p = 0.24). The variability of tumor motion between canine patients supports individualized assessments of each case to ensure best practice.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedThoracic NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAnimalsBreath HoldingDogsExhalationFemaleInhalationMaleProspective Studieschestdogplanning target volumerespiratory management

Identifiers

PMID42444534
PMCPMC13366279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.