ArticleBrain and behavior2026
Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Strength Predicts Musical Perception and Speech-in-Noise Performance in Nonmusicians.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe medial olivocochlear (MOC) reflex enhances the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in the cochlea and is implicated in auditory scene analysis. Although musicians often exhibit robust MOC function, it remains unclear whether related auditory advantages stem from innate predisposition or training-induced plasticity. This study investigated the relationship between individual variations in MOC reflex function, musical perception, and speech-in-noise (SIN) performance in nonmusicians.
methodsFifty-eight normal-hearing nonmusicians were divided into two groups on the basis of the magnitude of their MOC reflex strength, quantified via contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (cTEOAEs) measured separately in each ear. Participants with suppression values above the sample median were assigned to the high MOC function group, whereas those with values below the median comprised the low MOC function group. All participants underwent pure-tone and high-frequency audiometry, auditory efferent system evaluation, speech-in-noise (SIN) testing at 0 and -10 dB SNRs, and musical perception assessment using the Montreal Battery for Evaluation of Amusia (MBEA).
resultsThe group with stronger MOC reflex activity demonstrated significantly better performance on MBEA scale and memory subtests and superior SIN perception at 0 dB SNR. Hierarchical regression confirmed MOC strength as a significant predictor of SIN performance at -10 dB SNR. Mediation analysis revealed that musical perception abilities partially mediated the relationship between MOC function and SIN performance.
conclusionVariations in MOC reflex function among nonmusicians constitute a foundational biological trait that shapes auditory perception, supporting both musical abilities and speech-in-noise processing in the absence of formal musical training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.