Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42444430›Full record

ArticleCentral European journal of public health2026

Awareness of community about patient safety, medical errors and patient engagement: a cross-sectional study.

Emel Filiz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Central European journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Emel FilizDepartment of Health Management, Faculty of Health Sciences, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePreventable medical errors are recognized as an important public health problem. The aim of this study was to evaluate the awareness of adults in the community about patient safety, medical errors and patient participation; and to determine their experiences of medical errors.

methodsAdults older than 18 years living in the Konya city centre in Türkiye were included in the study. The implementation of the questionnaire took approximately two months, and a total of 780 valid questionnaires were obtained. Participants were asked questions about their views and attitudes towards medical errors. In addition, participants' engagement in behaviours recommended by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to prevent medical errors was evaluated using a 4-point Likert scale.

resultsTwenty-six percent of the participants stated that they or one of their family members had suffered a medical error. Those who were exposed to the error (n = 201) mostly experienced physical problems (44.3%). Other reported consequences included psychological problems (19.4%), disability (10.9%), loss of employment (5.5%), and death (2.5%). When the answers given to the questions about exposure to medical error and "whether the patients are responsible for preventing the errors" were compared with the socio-demographic characteristics, a statistically significant difference was found between age, education status, socioeconomic status, and experiencing with medical error (p < 0.05).

conclusionA significant part of the participants were harmed while receiving healthcare services. In addition, their awareness of protecting themselves from this harm was low. The findings of this study can guide healthcare professionals for patient safety training for patients.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMedical ErrorsPatient ParticipationPatient SafetyAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultawarenesscommunitymedical errorpatient engagementpatient safety

Identifiers

PMID42444430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.