Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42444340›Full record

ArticleRisk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis2026

Labor Supply, Risk Aversion, and Conflict Uncertainty.

Kiet Tuan Duong, Nam T Vu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kiet Tuan DuongUniversity of York, York, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1078-8079
Nam T VuMiami University, Oxford, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4286-2234

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We argue that the presence of conflict uncertainty fundamentally re-frames the labor-leisure choice for individual agents. During normal times, supplying labor is often perceived as a safe choice. When working itself becomes perceived as a gamble due to conflict risk, an aversion to that specific risk will result in a measurable decrease in labor supply. Using proximity to the Ukrainian border as a plausibly exogenous proxy for conflict uncertainty vis-à-vis the Russian incursion into Ukraine in 2014, we show that an increase in conflict uncertainty negatively affects individuals' willingness to work. Moreover, this response also coincides with increased perceived risk aversion arising from the conflict.

Indexed as

EmploymentHumansRiskRisk AssessmentUkraineUncertaintyconflict uncertaintyhealthlaborsafety and environmental (HS&E) risks

Identifiers

PMID42444340
PMCPMC13366054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.