Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42444319›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2026

The Unfinished Journey After Major Surgery: Interhospital Transfer and Care Fragmentation.

Rida Ejaz, Qaidar Alizai, Lorenza Arena, Kizuki Yuza, Charalampos M Charalampous, Abdulaziz Elemosho, Timothy M Pawlik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rida EjazDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Qaidar AlizaiDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Lorenza ArenaDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Kizuki YuzaDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Charalampos M CharalampousDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Abdulaziz ElemoshoDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Timothy M PawlikDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7994-9870

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterhospital transfer (IHTR) is commonly used to access specialized surgical care, yet post-discharge readmission destination among transferred surgical patients remains poorly characterized. Therefore, the association of IHTR and hospital transfer burden with care fragmentation after major surgery was evaluated.

methodsAdults aged ≥ 18 years undergoing major surgery between 2016 and 2020 were identified from the Nationwide Readmissions Database. Procedures included coronary artery bypass grafting, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, esophagectomy, hepatectomy, rectal resection, pneumonectomy, pancreatectomy, and colectomy. Patients were stratified as IHTR versus non-transfer (NTR). Care fragmentation was defined as 30-day readmission to a hospital different from the index surgical hospital. Multivariable regression evaluated the association of IHTR with postoperative and readmission outcomes. Hospital-level analyses evaluated the association between hospital transfer burden and care fragmentation.

resultsAmong 1,831,450 patients, 77,498 (4.2%) were categorized as IHTR and 1,753,952 (95.8%) as NTR. Compared with NTR patients, IHTR patients had higher comorbidity burden (median Elixhauser groups, 6 [IQR, 4-8] vs. 4 [IQR, 2-5]) and more commonly underwent nonelective surgery (n = 67,184 [86.7%] vs. n = 688,802 [39.3%]; both p < 0.001). Thirty-day readmission was modestly higher among IHTR versus NTR patients (n = 12,743 [16.4%] vs. n = 211,311 [12.1%]; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.05), whereas care fragmentation among readmitted patients was substantially more common after IHTR (n = 6424 [50.4%] vs. n = 40,327 [19.1%]; aOR = 3.75; 95% CI, 3.58-3.92). This association was consistent among nonelective (aOR = 4.05; 95% CI, 3.86-4.26) and elective patients (aOR = 3.46; 95% CI, 3.10-3.86). Greater hospital transfer burden was associated with higher care fragmentation odds overall and among NTR readmitted patients (both aOR, 1.08).

conclusionIHTR was strongly associated with care fragmentation after major surgery, despite a modest association with 30-day readmission overall. Greater hospital transfer burden was also associated with hospital-level care fragmentation, suggesting that transfer status and hospital transfer burden may help identify patients and hospitals at increased risk for fragmented post-discharge acute care within regionalized surgical systems.

Indexed as

Patient ReadmissionPatient TransferSurgical Procedures, OperativeAgedDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesUnited Statescare fragmentationcontinuity of Patient careoperativepatient readmissionpatient transfersurgical procedurestreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID42444319
PMCPMC13576586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.