Observational studyWorld journal of surgery2026
Mitigating Financial Barriers to Trauma Care in Cameroon Through Locally Designed Quality Improvement.
Observational study in World journal of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn low- and middle-income countries, trauma patients frequently face delays and inequities in care due to out-of-pocket payment requirements for basic medical supplies. In Cameroon, such financial barriers may impede timely emergency treatment and worsen outcomes. We evaluated whether the introduction of a locally designed care kit that provided essential supplies to emergency department (ED) providers without upfront payment improved timeliness and perceived affordability of initial trauma care.
methodsWe conducted a pre-/post-observational cohort study using data from the Cameroon Trauma Registry at a public regional referral hospital. Injured patients presenting during the six months before emergency kit implementation (December 2021 through May 2022) were compared with those presenting during the six months after implementation (June through November 2022). Outcomes included ED treatments, time from presentation to disposition, ED disposition, and patient-reported financial interference with care. Secondary analyses examined inpatient surgical care and discharge outcomes.
resultsA total of 399 patients were included, of whom 208 (52%) presented after kit implementation. Demographics and injury characteristics were similar between groups. Post-implementation, patients experienced shorter median time to ED disposition (13.8 vs. 15.1 h, p = 0.001) and were less likely to leave against medical advice (26.4% vs. 39.3%, p = 0.006). Although median estimated ED treatment costs increased (41,500 vs. 30,000 CFA francs, p < 0.001), the proportion of patients reporting financial interference with care decreased by more than half (22.6% vs. 47.6%, p < 0.001). Kit implementation did not reduce financial barriers to inpatient surgical care.
conclusionsProvision of essential emergency supplies without upfront payment was feasible and associated with improved timeliness and perceived affordability of trauma care. Addressing acute financial barriers in emergency settings may represent a pragmatic strategy to enhance access to care in resource-limited environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.