Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42444203›Full record

ReviewEndocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets2026

Intervention Strategies using

Nilima Wadnerwar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nilima WadnerwarDepartment of Agadtantra, Mahatma Gandhi Ayurved College, Hospital & Research Centre, Salod (H), Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be University), Wardha, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5553-2133

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChemicals consumed through food, water, air, and personal care products disrupt our endocrine system, contributing to a range of life-threatening diseases. Since this toxicity is cumulative, it is essential to incorporate the principles of toxicity treatment. The review was conducted to evaluate the potential utility of Agada formulations in managing diseases associated with endocrine-disrupting chemicals.

methodsElectronic searches were performed using terms "Agada", "Ayurveda", "antitoxic", "visha", "dūṣhivīṣha", "endocrine-disrupting chemicals", and "toxicity" including animal, clinical, or pharmacological studies of Agada formulations in any toxicant or cumulative toxin model; or conceptual reviews linking Agada to environmental/chemical toxicity. By reviewing Ayurvedic literature, studying research on

resultsThe conceptual framework of DISCUSSION: Agada formulations may offer an integrative approach to mitigating EDC-related diseases. Their known pharmacological actions, such as antioxidant activity, free radical scavenging, Nrf2 upregulation, NF-κB inhibition, and adaptogenic effects, align with the major pathophysiological pathways triggered by EDCs. However, the current evidence base is limited by the absence of standardized formulations, inconsistent dosing, lack of endocrine biomarker assessment, and a scarcity of clinical trials.

conclusionBy applying the treatment principles of Garavisha (swallowed poison) and Dushivisha (latent poison), disorders resulting from endocrine disruptors can be effectively addressed using Agada directing to generate empirical evidences through clinical trials.

Indexed as

Endocrine DisruptorsEndocrine System DiseasesMedicine, AyurvedicAnimalsAntioxidantsDrug CompoundingHumansAntioxidantsEndocrine Disruptorsclinical trialsDushivishaendocrine systemfree radicalGaravishaoxidative stress

Identifiers

PMID42444203
PMCPMC13591443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.