Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42444185›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2026

Reactive Chemistry at the Unrestricted Coupled Cluster Level: High-Throughput Calculations for Training Machine Learning Potentials.

Alice E A Allen, Rui Li, Sakib Matin, Xing Zhang, Benjamin Nebgen, Nicholas Lubbers, Justin S Smith, Richard Messerly, Sergei Tretiak, Garnet Kin-Lic Chan and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alice E A AllenCenter for Nonlinear Studies, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico87545, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8727-8333
Rui LiDivision of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California91125, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-9029-6847
Sakib MatinCenter for Nonlinear Studies, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico87545, United States.
Xing ZhangDivision of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California91125, United States.
Benjamin NebgenDivision of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California91125, United States.
Nicholas LubbersComputer, Computational, and Statistical Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico87545, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9001-9973
Justin S SmithNvidia CorpOration , 2788 San Tomas Expressway, Santa Clara, California95051, United States.
Richard MesserlyTheoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico87545, United States.
Sergei TretiakTheoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico87545, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5547-3647
Garnet Kin-Lic ChanDivision of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California91125, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8009-6038
Kipton BarrosCenter for Nonlinear Studies, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico87545, United States.

Funding

Los Alamos National Laboratory Center for Nonlinear StudiesTriad National Security 89233218CNA000001U.S. Department of Energy 89233218CNA000001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modeling chemical reactions accurately at the atomistic level requires high-level electronic structure theory due to the presence of unpaired electrons and the need to properly describe the energetics of bond breaking and bond formation. Commonly used approaches such as density functional theory (DFT) frequently fail for this task due to deficiencies that are well recognized. However, for high-fidelity approaches, creating large data sets of energies and forces for reactive processes to train machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) or force fields is daunting. For example, the use of the unrestricted coupled cluster level of theory has previously been seen as unfeasible due to high computational costs, the lack of analytical gradients in many computational codes, and additional challenges such as constructing suitable basis set corrections for forces. In this work, we develop new methods and workflows to overcome the challenges inherent to automating unrestricted coupled cluster calculations. Using these advancements, we create a data set of gas-phase reactions containing energies and forces for 3119 different organic molecules configurations calculated at the gold-standard level of unrestricted CCSD(T) (coupled cluster singles doubles and perturbative triples). With this data set, we provide an analysis of the differences between the density functional and unrestricted CCSD(T) descriptions. We develop a transferable MLIP for gas-phase reactions, trained on unrestricted CCSD(T) data, and demonstrate the advantages of transitioning away from DFT data. Transitioning from training to DFT to training to UCCSD(T) data sets yields an improvement of more than 0.1 eV/Å in force accuracy and over 0.1 eV in activation energy reproduction.

Identifiers

PMID42444185
PMCPMC13422027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.