ArticleThe Clinical journal of pain2026
From Evidence to Practice: Implementing the 2026 Canadian Clinical Practice Guideline Update on Vaccination-Related Distress in the Dutch National Immunization Program.
Article in The Clinical journal of pain, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- HELPinKids&Adults 2026 Guideline Update on Reducing Distress During Vaccine Injections: Overview of Methods and the Evidence Base.The Clinical journal of pain · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractVaccination-related distress (VRD) encompasses a range of stress reactions associated with vaccination, including pain, needle fear, and stress. VRD is a significant barrier to immunization, contributing to up to 8% of vaccination refusals in children and even higher rates in under-vaccinated populations. Beyond immediate discomfort, VRD can lead to long-term psychological and physical consequences, underscoring the need for effective VRD-mitigation strategies. The updated knowledge synthesis and clinical practice guideline by the HELPinKids&Adults team provides evidence-based recommendations organized using the 5P framework: process, procedural, physical, pharmacological, and psychological interventions. These interventions target different user groups, including children, their support persons, and health care professionals. Multicomponent (complex) interventions, such as the Canadian CARD system (Comfort-Ask-Relax-Distract), integrate education with multiple VRD-reducing strategies. These multicomponent (complex) interventions have been shown to be effective in reducing VRD and promoted the adoption of other VRD-reducing interventions. However, the efficacy of a multicomponent (complex) intervention in the Canadian context does not guarantee its applicability in the Dutch setting. Consequently, the adaptation of such an intervention for the Dutch National Immunization Program necessitates a systematic implementation approach. Using the EPIS framework (Exploration-Preparation-Implementation-Sustainment), we explain our experiences to date with the cultural adaptation of the CARD system, the engagement of user groups, and the preparation of a Dutch version of the CARD system for pilot testing within the Dutch vaccination context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.