ReviewChinese neurosurgical journal2026
Advances in local field potential research in prolonged disorders of consciousness: a narrative review.
Review in Chinese neurosurgical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prolonged disorders of consciousness (pDOC)-including coma, vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (VS/UWS), and minimally conscious state (MCS)-remain diagnostically and therapeutically challenging. Even with validated instruments such as the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R), behavioral assessment yields misdiagnosis rates approaching 40%, as fluctuating arousal, motor impairment, and sedation can mask preserved cognition. Because the VS/UWS-MCS distinction directly shapes prognostic counseling, rehabilitation, and decisions about life-sustaining treatment, and because the circuit-level pathophysiology of pDOC is still incompletely mapped, objective physiology-based biomarkers are urgently needed to complement bedside examination. This narrative review, informed by a structured search of PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Web of Science, focuses on studies directly reporting intracranial electrophysiology-particularly local field potential (LFP) recordings from the central thalamus-in patients with pDOC. Indirect evidence from anesthesia paradigms, animal models, and related neuromodulation settings is invoked only to clarify mechanism or methodology. We group current findings into four complementary signal domains: oscillatory activity (slow oscillations and burst suppression through theta, alpha, beta, and gamma rhythms); thalamocortical and corticostriatal functional connectivity; aperiodic/scale-free dynamics reflecting excitation-inhibition balance; and nonlinear complexity measures indexing information integration. Single-unit firing, cross-frequency coupling (CFC), and evoked or perturbational responses are considered alongside these. All four are interpreted within a unifying mesocircuit-and-criticality framework, in which impaired consciousness reflects reduced arousal gain, degraded thalamocortical integration, and departure from the critical dynamical regime sustaining conscious-capable dynamics. Intracranial LFP recordings thus offer a rare mechanistic window onto thalamocortical dysfunction in pDOC and may eventually inform patient stratification, target selection, and mechanism-guided neuromodulation. The evidence base remains limited; however, small samples, etiological heterogeneity, variable recording conditions, sparse direct human data, and a predominance of group- rather than individual-level analyses constrain current inference. Translation is further complicated by unresolved ethical issues around surrogate consent, equitable access, and disclosure of diagnostic uncertainty. Meaningful progress will depend less on technical novelty than on standardized protocols, multicenter validation, and rigorous ethical frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.