Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42444009›Full record

ArticlePerioperative medicine (London, England)2026

Ultrasound-guided distal peripheral nerve blocks of the ulnar, median, and radial nerves in hand and wrist surgery: a descriptive case series.

Adriana Vivas, John J Heifner, Angel P Saavedra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adriana VivasOchsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, USA. adrianavivas0524@gmail.com.
John J HeifnerLarkin Hospital Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Angel P SaavedraMiami Bone and Joint Institute, Miami, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the increasing prevalence of surgical centers, identifying the safest and most efficient anesthetic techniques is vital. Ultrasound-guided distal peripheral nerve block (US-DPNB) is a technique that has shown promise in published literature for blocking the ulnar, median, and radial nerves at the level of the forearm. This descriptive case series examines 50 patients who underwent hand or wrist surgery with a focus on outcomes following the application of US-DPNB. The technique used in this study was performed by an anesthesiologist, Dr. Angel Saavedra, at an outpatient surgical center. The purpose of this descriptive case series is to describe beneficial clinical outcomes and the feasibility of blocking the median, ulnar, and radial nerves at the level of the forearm in the context of hand and wrist surgeries in surgical centers.

methodsThe primary outcomes included a pain scale from 1 to 5, block performance time, and postoperative complications. The secondary outcomes are tourniquet time, patient satisfaction, and return of hand movement. With IRB approval, patients were followed up for up to five days post-surgery to assess outcomes. Either a distal or proximal block was performed at the level of the forearm. Exclusion criteria included repeat surgery on the same hand, procedures expected to exceed 20 min of tourniquet time, and patients with pre-existing peripheral nerve disorders, or prior surgeries affecting nerve anatomy. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics only; no inferential comparisons between groups were performed.

resultsThe DFB group presented an average block time of 95.59s, whereas the PFB group presented a mean block time of 73.9s. The pain scores decreased in both groups over the five-day follow-up period. Notably, the only recorded complication was postoperative nausea in one patient in the PFB group.

conclusionThis descriptive case series demonstrates the feasibility of US-DPNB as a primary anesthetic technique for short-duration ambulatory hand and wrist procedures, with low complication rates and high patient satisfaction. As a study without a comparator group, claims regarding economic benefit cannot be formally established; however, the opioid-sparing profile and favorable outcomes observed support further investigation through controlled trials. WGC: 20245045.

Indexed as

Hand and wrist surgeriesNerve blockRegional anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID42444009
PMCPMC13647781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.