ArticleBMC nursing2026
Caffeine expectancy, explicit and implicit memory performance among female nursing students: a placebo-controlled quasi-experimental study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFor nursing students, memory performance is important for medication learning, clinical reasoning, patient safety, and skill acquisition. This study examined whether caffeine expectancy was associated with explicit and implicit memory performance during morning and afternoon testing sessions.
methodsA convenience sample of 74 female nursing students participated. Participants were classified into high- and low-expectancy groups based on CaffEQ scores and were tested either in the morning (8 AM) or afternoon (4 PM). Explicit and implicit memory were assessed using standardized memory tasks. Data were analyzed using a 2 × 2 factorial ANOVA.
resultsParticipants had a mean age of 21.05 ± 0.97 years. Explicit and implicit memory scores showed only minor descriptive differences across expectancy groups and testing sessions. Two-way factorial ANOVA revealed no significant main effects of caffeine expectancy or time of day on explicit or implicit memory performance, and no significant interaction between caffeine expectancy and time of day was found. Overall, memory performance did not differ significantly across study conditions, and all effects remained nonsignificant under the Bonferroni-adjusted threshold of p < .025.
conclusionCaffeine expectancy was not significantly associated with explicit or implicit memory performance under the present study conditions. Given the limited sample size, absence of chronotype assessment, and relatively weak expectancy manipulation, these null findings should be interpreted cautiously.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.