ArticleBMC nursing2026
Predicting nurses' behavioral intention to adopt artificial intelligence in a resource-limited setting: an extended technology acceptance model study in Iran.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into healthcare systems has the potential to substantially enhance clinical decision-making, workflow efficiency, and quality of patient care. However, the successful implementation of AI technologies largely depends on their acceptance by frontline healthcare providers, particularly nurses. While the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) has been widely used to explain technology adoption, evidence remains limited regarding the role of nurses' cognitive and attitudinal factors in resource-limited settings.
methodsA cross-sectional analytical study was conducted in 2025 among nurses working in hospitals affiliated with Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Using a census-based approach, 340 nurses were invited to participate, of whom 199 completed a validated online questionnaire. Data were collected using Davis's Technology Acceptance Model scales (Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use) alongside an adapted instrument measuring knowledge, attitude, behavioral intention, and practical use of AI. Non-parametric tests and multiple linear regression analysis were performed using SPSS version 26.
resultsMost participants demonstrated low levels of AI-related knowledge (70.4%) and relatively unfavorable attitudes toward AI (66.8%). Behavioral intention to adopt AI was moderate (57.3%), while reported practical use was low (48.7%). Attitude emerged as the strongest predictor (β = 0.272, p < 0.001), followed by perceived ease of use (β = 0.198, p = 0.006), perceived usefulness (β = 0.174, p = 0.016), and knowledge (β = 0.127, p = 0.047).
conclusionThis study demonstrates that extending the Technology Acceptance Model by incorporating nurses' knowledge and attitudes provides a meaningful framework for predicting AI adoption in resource-limited healthcare settings. Beyond technological considerations, fostering positive attitudes and foundational AI literacy among nurses is essential for successful implementation. Targeted educational and organizational interventions are urgently needed to prepare the nursing workforce for AI-enabled healthcare. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.