ArticleBMC health services research2026
Approval and delay status of United States -approved new drugs (2010-2023) in European Union, Japan, and China.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChina has long been faced with a drug lag. A decade has passed since China launched its pharmaceutical regulatory reforms, and related policies have been continuously optimized, yet their effectiveness remains to be evaluated. This retrospective analysis uses the United States as a reference to compare drug lags among the European Union, Japan, and China, and investigates key factors underlying lags between the US and China.
methodsThis study examined new drugs first approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 2010 and 2023. We conducted a descriptive analysis of key characteristics, including approval dates, drug categories, and development strategies. We further investigated factors associated with drug approval lag using the Mann-Whitney U test and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).
resultsFrom 2010 to 2023, the FDA approved 516 new drugs. Of these, 399, 301, and 266 were authorized by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), and the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA), respectively. China's drug approval lag decreased from 1,667 days in 2010-2014 to 635 days in 2020-2023. Furthermore, we found that the EMA's lag was mainly concentrated in the review phase, the PMDA's lag was mainly concentrated in the submission phase, and the NMPA showed a substantial lag in both phases. Factors influencing drug approval lag in China include whether conditional approval was granted by the NMPA, whether FDA breakthrough therapy designation was obtained, the region of the Marketing Authorization Holder whether a domestic development strategy in China was adopted, and whether external collaborative research and development was used. From a clinical development strategy perspective, drugs undergoing Multi-Regional Clinical Trial and early bridging trials experience shorter approval lag.
conclusionsSince China's pharmaceutical regulatory reforms, the number of newly approved drugs has increased, and approval lag has shortened, although it remains longer than that of the EMA and PMDA. We recommend that the NMPA improve review efficiency to reduce approval lag and adopt more favorable policies to encourage earlier development and submission in China, thereby alleviating submission lag.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.