ArticleBMC oral health2026
Comparison of the biocidal efficacy of sodium dichloro-iso-cyanurate, double antibiotic pastes and calcium hydroxide as intra-canal medicaments for regenerative endodontic therapy: an ex-vivo study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to determine the antibacterial efficacy of sodium dichloro-iso-cyanurate (NaDCC) compared to double antibiotic paste (DAP) and calcium hydroxide (CH) against Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis).
methodsThe study utilized a sample of forty-four human single-rooted teeth, which were decoronated and chemo-mechanically prepared. E. faecalis was then inoculated into the teeth for four weeks. The samples were randomly divided into four groups, each receiving a different intracanal medicament: DAP ([Formula: see text]), NaDCC ([Formula: see text]), CH ([Formula: see text]), and a control group treated with sterile water ([Formula: see text]). After a contact time of 28 days, a sample was taken from each root canal with a paper point. The number of colony-forming units was then calculated, and data analysis was performed using Kruskal Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests.
resultsAll the medicaments had a significantly higher antibacterial effect than the control group ([Formula: see text]). DAP showed a significantly higher antibacterial effect than NaDCC ([Formula: see text]) and CH ([Formula: see text]). NaDCC showed a significantly higher antibacterial effect than CH ([Formula: see text]).
conclusionThe study's results indicate that DAP is the most effective medicament against E. faecalis. However, the study also revealed that NaDCC, a relatively novel substance in endodontics, demonstrated a higher antibacterial efficacy than CH. This suggests that NaDCC could be a promising addition to the range of medicaments used in regenerative procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.