Observational studyBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
Beyond patient perception: PROMs correlate with objective functional tests following knee cartilage repair.
Observational study in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are widely used to evaluate subjective knee function after cartilage repair surgery, but their association with objective functional performance is unclear. This study explored correlations between PROMs and functional performance tests in patients after knee cartilage repair.
methodsIn this monocentric observational study, 52 patients from the German Cartilage Registry underwent standardized functional testing at a mean follow-up of 66.8 months. PROMs included the subjective IKDC score and KOOS subscales. Functional performance comprised isometric strength testing, single-leg hop tests (SLHD), Timed Up and Go (TUG), Timed 6-Meter Hop (T6H), 30-second Sit-to-Stand, and Single Leg Stance. Spearman correlations were calculated between PROMs and limb symmetry indices or performance categories.
resultsDynamic unilateral hop tests showed the strongest associations with PROMs, with SLHD symmetry correlating strongly with IKDC (ρ = 0.540) and moderately with all KOOS subscales. T6H performance also correlated strongly with IKDC and KOOS Sport. Knee extension strength showed moderate correlations with IKDC and KOOS Sport, whereas flexion strength and low-demand tests (TUG, Single Leg Stance) showed no significant associations.
conclusionPROMs demonstrate moderate, test-dependent correlations with objective functional performance after knee cartilage repair, particularly for dynamic unilateral tasks. PROMs reflect functional impairment but cannot replace objective testing. Therefore, a combined assessment approach is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.