ArticleBMC psychiatry2026
Sexual function concerns and attitudes toward discussing them with psychiatrists among psychiatric outpatients in Japan: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSexual dysfunction, defined as persistent difficulties in sexual desire, arousal, or orgasm, affects treatment adherence to psychotropic medication and quality of life in people with mental disorders, yet patients rarely disclose such concerns to clinicians. Understanding patient-perceived barriers to disclosure is critical for improving care, but empirical data from psychiatric outpatient settings remain limited, particularly in Japan where cultural norms around sexual health may further inhibit communication.
methodsWe conducted an anonymous cross-sectional online survey of psychiatric outpatients (N = 264) at 9 Japanese institutions between July and September 2024. Participants reported sexual function concerns, self-attributed main contributors, and attitudes toward discussing these concerns with their psychiatrist, classified as Active, Passive, or No-intention/other. Multivariable multinomial logistic regression examined factors associated with these attitudes (N = 223), adjusting for sex, age, depressive symptoms, and socioeconomic factors.
resultsCurrent sexual function concerns were reported by 22.3% of respondents, with lifetime concerns reaching 33.3%. Among those with current concerns, one-third attributed their concerns primarily to medication. Only 30% held an Active attitude toward consulting their psychiatrist about sexual function. In the combined analytic sample spanning current and hypothetical response contexts, women had 2.4-fold higher adjusted odds of a No-intention/other attitude versus an Active attitude (aOR = 2.42, 95% CI 1.07-5.46, p = 0.033) after adjustment for age, depressive symptoms, and socioeconomic factors.
conclusionsMost psychiatric outpatients with sexual function concerns held passive or non-disclosing attitudes toward discussing them with their psychiatrist. In the combined analysis of current and hypothetical response contexts, women had higher adjusted odds of a No-intention/other rather than an Active attitude. Given that many patients attribute their concerns to medication, routine clinician-initiated screening and patient-centered communication may help identify modifiable contributors and thereby support adherence to psychiatric treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.