SynthesisBMC pediatrics2026
Neonatal sepsis in Ethiopia: unveiling the persistent burden through systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeonatal sepsis remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality globally, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Despite several studies conducted in Ethiopia, estimates of its burden remains inconsistent.
objectiveTo estimate the pooled prevalence of neonatal sepsis in Ethiopia, along with its regional and temporal variations.
methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Science-Direct databases and grey literature were searched for observational studies published from April 2019 to September 2025. Nineteen studies with 9,242 neonates were included. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate pooled prevalence, and subgroup analyses, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses were performed. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Egger's test.
resultsThe pooled prevalence of neonatal sepsis was 44.1% (95% CI: 35.9-52.3), with high heterogeneity (I² = 98.4%). Subgroup analysis revealed the highest prevalence in Southern Ethiopia (49.2%) and the lowest in a pooled subgroup of studies from both Addis Ababa and Somali regions (36.1%). Prevalence was higher in studies before 2020 (44.9%) compared with those after 2020. Early-onset sepsis accounted for 31.0% and late-onset for 16.9%. Funnel plot asymmetry suggested potential publication bias, but none of the variables showed a statistically significant association with neonatal sepsis prevalence (p > 0.05) using meta-regression.
conclusionNearly one in two neonates admitted to Ethiopian health facilities are affected by sepsis, a rate substantially higher than regional and global estimates. Strengthened infection prevention, improved diagnostics, and targeted interventions are urgently needed. These findings provide updated evidence about the pooled prevalence of neonatal sepsis in Ethiopia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42443819What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.