Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42443778›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2026

Recent advances in machine learning and Bayesian modeling for tropical disease prediction, diagnosis, and risk analysis: a scoping review.

I Gede Nyoman Mindra Jaya, Junaid Khan

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

I Gede Nyoman Mindra JayaDepartment of Statistics, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, 45363, Indonesia. mindra@unpad.ac.id.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1391-4138
Junaid KhanDepartment of Statistics, Vivekananda College, Thakurpukur, Kolkata, 63, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnhancing the capacity to forecast tropical disease transmission, identify key risk factors, and support timely public health responses is closely aligned with broader efforts to strengthen population health, including Sustainable Development Goal 3 on good health and well-being. Machine learning and deep learning models have shown strong potential for prediction and classification tasks, but their limited interpretability and incomplete treatment of uncertainty may constrain their use in public health decision-making. Bayesian methods, by contrast, provide a probabilistic framework for incorporating uncertainty, prior information, and spatial or temporal dependence, although they often involve greater methodological and computational complexity. In this context, we conducted a scoping review of recent research on machine learning, deep learning, and Bayesian approaches for tropical infectious disease prediction, diagnosis, risk mapping, risk analysis, and surveillance.

methodsThis study presents a scoping review of recent advances and current trends in machine learning, deep learning, Bayesian, and hybrid modeling approaches for tropical disease prediction, diagnosis, and risk analysis, covering studies published between 1 January 2025 and 1 January 2026 and reported following the PRISMA-ScR checklist. The review examines (i) disease-specific modeling approaches, (ii) predictive and diagnostic performance, (iii) epidemiological applications in which different methods were applied or showed advantages, and (iv) methodological and practical implications for future research and real-world applications.

resultsA total of 97 Scopus-indexed, peer-reviewed articles published between 1 January 2025 and 1 January 2026 were included in the synthesis. Methodologically, machine/deep learning approaches were reported in 50 studies, slightly outnumbering Bayesian methods, which were reported in 43 studies. Hybrid Bayesian-machine learning approaches remained rare, with only 4 studies identified, suggesting that methodological integration is still at an early stage. The literature was concentrated on dengue and malaria, which together accounted for 61 of the 97 reviewed studies, possibly reflecting their high public health burden and greater availability of surveillance data.

conclusionOverall, the literature remains strongly focused on dengue and malaria, with machine and deep learning models primarily used for prediction-oriented tasks and Bayesian approaches more often applied to risk mapping and determinant analysis because of their ability to explicitly quantify uncertainty. In practice, much of the existing literature is still centered on climate-related transmission, forecasting, and early warning. Although the integration of Bayesian models with machine learning or deep learning has been discussed in recent studies, real-world applications remain limited and are mostly exploratory rather than routinely implemented. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Communicable DiseasesMachine LearningTropical MedicineBayes TheoremHumansPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRisk AssessmentBayesian modelingEarly warning systemsHybrid ML–Bayesian approachesMachine learningScoping reviewTropical infectious diseases

Identifiers

PMID42443778
PMCPMC13647516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.