Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42443769›Full record

Observational studyBMC emergency medicine2026

Post-resuscitation pre-hospital emergency anaesthesia for exchange of a supraglottic airway device with an endotracheal tube - a multicentre observational study.

Jonas Bökamp, Eugen Latka, Michael Bernhard, Martin Deicke, Daniel Fischer, Julia Grannemann, Jochen Hinkelbein, Yacin Keller, Annika Hoyer, André Kobiella and 5 more

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jonas BökampMedical School OWL, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstraße 25, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany. jonas.boekamp@uni-bielefeld.de.ORCID 0009-0005-9338-1889
Eugen LatkaDepartment of Medicine and Emergency Services, Westphalia-Lippe Study Institute, Rohrteichstraße 71, 33602, Bielefeld, Germany.
Michael BernhardEmergency Department, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Martin DeickeMedical Direction of Emergency Services, Osnabrück Rural District, Am Schölerberg 1, 49082, Osnabrück, Germany.
Daniel FischerMedical Direction of Emergency Services, Lippe District, Felix-Fechenbach Straße 5, 32756, Detmold, Germany.
Julia GrannemannMedical Direction of Emergency Services, Gütersloh District, Herzebrocker Straße 140, 33334, Gütersloh, Germany.
Jochen HinkelbeinUniversity Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine, and Pain Management, Johannes Wesling Hospital Minden, Ruhr-University Bochum, Hans-Nolte Straße 1, 32427, Minden, Germany.
Yacin KellerMedical Direction of Emergency Services, Integrated Regional Control Centre, City of Dresden Fire Department, Dr.-Külz-Ring 19, 01067, Dresden, Germany.
Annika HoyerBiostatistics and Medical Biometry, Medical School OWL, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstraße 25, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany.
André KobiellaMedical Direction of Emergency Services, Gütersloh District, Herzebrocker Straße 140, 33334, Gütersloh, Germany.
Lydia Johnson Kolaparambil VargheseUniversity Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine, and Pain Management, Johannes Wesling Hospital Minden, Ruhr-University Bochum, Hans-Nolte Straße 1, 32427, Minden, Germany.
Bernd StrickmannMedical Direction of Emergency Services, Gütersloh District, Herzebrocker Straße 140, 33334, Gütersloh, Germany.
Mathini VaseekaranUniversity Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine, and Pain Management, Johannes Wesling Hospital Minden, Ruhr-University Bochum, Hans-Nolte Straße 1, 32427, Minden, Germany.
Vera Von DossowInstitute of Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy, Heart and Diabetes Centre NRW, Ruhr-University Bochum, Georgstraße 11, 32545, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.
Gerrit JansenUniversity Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine, and Pain Management, Johannes Wesling Hospital Minden, Ruhr-University Bochum, Hans-Nolte Straße 1, 32427, Minden, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPost-resuscitation pre-hospital emergency anaesthesia (PHEA) for changing a supraglottic airway device (SGA) to an endotracheal tube (ETT) after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest may improve airway management but carries potential risks, particularly related to haemodynamic instability. This study investigates its association with complications during post-resuscitation care.

methodsAll Emergency Medical Service missions in the districts Gütersloh, Dresden and Lippe from 2019 to 2021 were analysed for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and supplemented with data from the German Resuscitation Register. Unconscious adult, pre-hospitally resuscitated patients who had an SGA changed to an ETT following pre-hospital return of spontaneous circulation and who had spontaneous circulation on admission to hospital were included. We compared patients with and without PHEA. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of haemodynamic complications during post-resuscitation therapy, defined as re-arrest, hypotension or antihypotensive therapy. For statistical analysis, propensity score matching was performed adjusting for age, sex, pre-existing disease, shockable initial cardiac rhythm, bystander CPR and witnessed arrest.

resultsOf 2,305 cardiac arrest patients in 391,305 Emergency Medical Service missions, 706 (30.6%) had return of spontaneous circulation and 202 met our inclusion criteria. 126 of those patients (62.4%) received PHEA to facilitate changing an SGA to an ETT. The propensity score analysis showed no evidence for differences in the odds of occurrence of at least one haemodynamic complication (OR=1.50 [95% CI=0.72-3.11; p=0.28]), airway complication (OR=1.00 [95% CI=0.25-4.00; p=1.00]), re-arrest (OR=0.39 [95% CI=0.14-1.08; p=0.07]), hypotension (OR=1.39 [95% CI=0.68-2.83; p=0.37]) or antihypotensive therapy (OR=1.58 [95% CI=0.77-3.26; p=0.21]) between patients having their SGA changed to an ETT following PHEA compared to patients who had their SGA changed to an ETT without PHEA.

conclusionsThe study provided no statistical evidence for increased odds of complications associated with the delivery or omission of pre-hospital emergency anaesthesia during exchange from a supraglottic airway device to an endotracheal tube in resuscitated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Airway ManagementAnesthesiaCardiopulmonary ResuscitationEmergency Medical ServicesIntubation, IntratrachealOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestAgedFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedAdverse effectsIntratrachealIntubationLaryngeal masksOut-of-hospital cardiac arrestPost cardiac arrest syndrome

Identifiers

PMID42443769
PMCPMC13366920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.