Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42443758›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2026

Exploratory study of electroencephalogram markers of responsiveness to surgical noxious stimuli under propofol anaesthesia.

Vidushani Dhanawansa, Jamie Sleigh, Amy Gaskell, Adeel Razi, Levin Kuhlmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vidushani DhanawansaDepartment of Data Science and AI, Faculty of IT, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Jamie SleighDepartment of Anaesthesia, Waikato Clinical Campus, University of Auckland, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Amy GaskellDepartment of Anaesthesia, Waikato Clinical Campus, University of Auckland, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Adeel RaziMonash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Levin KuhlmannDepartment of Data Science and AI, Faculty of IT, Monash University, Clayton, Australia. levin.kuhlmann@monash.edu.

Funding

ANZCA Research Foundation 17/009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile general anaesthesia typically induces unconsciousness, some patients retain the capacity to respond behaviourally to noxious stimulation. Reduced frontal alpha (8-12 Hz) power has been proposed as a marker of arousal, but its clinical reliability remains inconsistent. This exploratory study aimed to identify multichannel EEG spectral and connectivity markers associated with intraoperative behavioural responsiveness around noxious stimulation.

methodsSixty-four-channel EEG was recorded intraoperatively from seven patients undergoing microlaryngoscopy under propofol anaesthesia with analgesia. Responsiveness was assessed via reactions to verbal commands. Alpha-band spectral features of responders and non-responders were compared pre- and post-noxious stimulation using descriptive statistics. Linear mixed models evaluated the relationship between channel-wise spectral power, and the factors of noxious stimulation and responsiveness. Event-related synchronization/desynchronization and connectivity via weighted Symbolic Mutual Information (wSMI) were analysed across frequency bands and response categories, with correction for multiple comparisons.

resultsAlpha power and global coherence showed minimal changes following noxious stimulation across patients. In contrast, volitional responses to noxious stimulation were associated with increased high-frequency power in sensory-motor and auditory cortices. These responses showed event-related synchronisation in left-central channels, whereas incoherent movements were marked by desynchronisation in the same areas. Theta-band activity further differentiated response types: cognitive responses showed suppression, while incoherent movements showed enhancement, particularly over the same regions. Cognitive responses were associated with increased global whole-brain integration, especially in the theta-band linking motor, auditory, and premotor cortices. Incoherent movements, by contrast, were associated with reductions in global brain connectivity. None of these patients reported postoperative awareness with recall.

conclusionThese preliminary findings suggest that localised high-frequency power increases and enhanced theta-band connectivity may reflect "connected consciousness," in which patients retain the capacity to process sensory input despite anaesthesia. As this state may precede awareness with recall, particularly during noxious stimulation, its detection remains a key clinical challenge, underscoring the potential of these multichannel EEG features as markers. Despite limitations in sample size and variability in anaesthetic and patient factors, the surgical setting enhances the clinical relevance of these findings. However, further validation is required before clinical application for intraoperative monitoring and optimisation of analgesia prior to noxious stimulation.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, IntravenousElectroencephalographyPropofolAdultFemaleHumansLaryngoscopyMaleMiddle AgedAnesthetics, IntravenousPropofolConnected consciousnessElectroencephalography (EEG)Intraoperative responsivenessNoxious stimulusPropofol anaesthesia

Identifiers

PMID42443758
PMCPMC13644145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.