SynthesisBMC gastroenterology2026
Efficacy of gut-brain neuromodulators in functional esophageal disorders: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatients with functional esophageal disorders exhibit symptoms such as chest pain, heartburn, dysphagia, globus sensation, or reflux hypersensitivity in the absence of structural abnormalities. This is characterized by dysregulated gut-brain interactions and visceral hypersensitivity.
methodsA systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials databases was performed to December 31, 2025. Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCT) reporting the effects of gut-brain neuromodulator (GBN) therapy on functional chest pain (FCP), functional heartburn (FH), reflux hypersensitivity (RH), functional dysphagia (FD), and globus were analyzed. KEY
resultsAmong 2538 screened records, 29 RCTs were included. Neuromodulators provided symptom relief in 18-67% of patients with FCP, with 52-71% achieving ≥ 50% symptom reduction. Moreover, 46-80% of patients experienced a globus reduction of more than 50%. In contrast, the number of included studies for RH and FH was small, and the evidence was inconsistent. In healthy individuals, human experimental models indicated that central or local sensory-modulatory pathways can mitigate acid-induced hyperalgesia, thereby offering a promising therapeutic strategy for RH. Convincing evidence to support the use of GBN in the treatment of FD is lacking. However, its effects on normal human esophageal motility also provides strategies for drug selection, although these outcome indicators vary substantially. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: GBNs can alleviate FCP, improve globus, and to some extent regulate esophageal sensation. However, their effectiveness for FD, FH, and RH remains controversial. Accordingly, future well-designed and phenotype-specific RCTs are required to establish the role of GBNs in clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.