Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42443724›Full record

ArticleChild: care, health and development2026

Learning and Sharing Together to Work Better Together: Service Providers' and Parents' Perceptions of the ENVISAGE-Integrated Programme.

Alice K Soper, Marilyn Wright, Debra Hughes, Marion Knutson, Elizabeth Chambers, Kim Hesketh, Jessica Hanson, Andrea Cross, Christine Imms, Michelle Phoenix and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child: care, health and development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Alice K SoperSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Marilyn WrightSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2931-5746
Debra HughesCanChild Centre for Childhood-Onset Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Marion KnutsonCanChild Centre for Childhood-Onset Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Elizabeth ChambersCanChild Centre for Childhood-Onset Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Kim HeskethChildren's Treatment Network, Ontario, Canada.
Jessica HansonChildren's Treatment Network, Ontario, Canada.
Andrea CrossCanChild Centre for Childhood-Onset Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Christine ImmsDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Michelle PhoenixSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Sandra MollSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Olivia NgMcMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton, Canada.
Peter RosenbaumCanChild Centre for Childhood-Onset Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6751-5613

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)Physicians' Services Incorporated (PSI) Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundENabling VISions And Growing Expectations (ENVISAGE) is a programme focused on strengths-based approaches to child development, empowering parents of children with neurodevelopmental disabilities. The established ENVISAGE-Families and ENVISAGE-Service Providers programmes have been evaluated through several studies, demonstrating positive impacts. Building on the success of these programmes, an 'integrated' version was co-developed and co-delivered to both parents and service providers through five online weekly workshops, encouraging both groups to learn with and from each other.

methodsA pilot study was conducted to evaluate ENVISAGE-Integrated. The programme was delivered in five cohorts of five to eight participants each, co-facilitated by a parent and service provider from the ENVISAGE research team. Participants completed five weekly workshop surveys and a semi-structured interview after the programme. Quantitative data from surveys were analysed using descriptive statistics and Mann-Whitney tests. Qualitative data from semi-structured interviews were explored using thematic analysis.

resultsNineteen service providers and 11 parents of children with neurodevelopmental disabilities participated in the programme at one children's treatment centre. Survey responses indicated high levels of agreement regarding comfort, perceived learning and meaningfulness of participating with parents and service providers. Thematic analysis generated three themes that reflected the perceptions and experiences of both parents and service providers: (i) reaffirmation of the importance of collaborating and relationship-building; (ii) expansion of understanding how to work together; and (iii) appreciation for each other's realities as people first and foremost. A fourth theme relevant to parents was a sense of connection and support from other parents' shared experiences. A fifth theme relevant to service providers was validation of clinical practice through alignment of content with parent values.

conclusionsENVISAGE-Integrated offered benefits by facilitating collaborative learning between parents and service providers. Although findings are promising, ENVISAGE-Integrated requires thoughtful recruitment and balanced group composition to ensure the programme benefits both parents and service providers.

Indexed as

Neurodevelopmental DisordersParentsAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelChildChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolCooperative BehaviorFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsProfessional-Family RelationsProgram Evaluation

Identifiers

PMID42443724
PMCPMC13365022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.