ArticleCarbon balance and management2026
Disentangling exogenous and endogenous memory in global vegetation productivity: dominant role and future strengthening of vegetation carryover effects.
Article in Carbon balance and management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vegetation productivity is not only determined by current environmental conditions but also reflects the lagged influence of past climate and vegetation states. This temporal dependency, often referred to as ecological memory, arises from both antecedent climate conditions (exogenous lagged climatic effects, LCE) and prior vegetation states (endogenous vegetation growth carryover effects, VGC). However, their spatiotemporal variability, relative importance, and responses to future climate change remain poorly understood at the global scale. Here, we develop a unified analytical framework by integrating vector autoregressive model and impulse response functions to disentangle the roles of LCE and VGC in regulating global gross primary productivity (GPP) across space, time, and future climate scenarios. Both components exhibit rapid initial responses followed by gradual decay within approximately five months, yet differ markedly in magnitude, direction, and persistence. LCE show strong hemispheric asymmetry: in the Northern Hemisphere, increases in temperature exert the strongest positive effect on GPP, whereas increases in atmospheric dryness (vapor pressure deficit) produce the strongest negative effect. In contrast, in the Southern Hemisphere, increased precipitation is the dominant positive driver of GPP, while negative responses exhibit greater spatial heterogeneity and show no clear dominant controlling factor, suggesting more complex and regionally varying climatic influences. In contrast, VGC display globally consistent positive responses with substantially greater intensity (17.35 gC m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.