Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2026
Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on psychomotor skill acquisition during laparoscopic training: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcquisition of laparoscopic psychomotor skills is essential for safe minimally invasive surgery but is associated with a steep learning curve. Simulation-based training improves proficiency; however, additional strategies to accelerate skill acquisition are sought. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to facilitate motor learning, but its effect on laparoscopic training remains uncertain.
methodsIn this prospective, sham-controlled trial, 33 medical students without prior laparoscopic experience were allocated to active tDCS (n = 16) or sham stimulation (n = 17) during laparoscopic simulation training. Stimulation was delivered using the Halo Sport system (1.4 mA, 20 min) over bilateral primary motor cortices. Baseline psychomotor abilities were assessed using the Vienna Test System (Motor Performance Series, 2HAND, and 3D spatial ability tests). Laparoscopic skills were evaluated using the Laparoscopic Skills Testing and Training (LASTT) model, including camera navigation (CN), hand-eye coordination (HE), and bimanual coordination (Bi), on days 1, 3, 5, and 7. Group differences in final performance (day 7) were analyzed using linear models and ANCOVA, adjusting for baseline performance and prespecified covariates.
resultsBoth groups demonstrated significant improvement across all laparoscopic tasks over time (all p < 0.001). Active tDCS was independently associated with higher final bimanual coordination performance compared with sham stimulation (adjusted ANCOVA: F (1,13) = 14.92, p = 0.002). No independent effect of tDCS was observed for camera navigation (p = 0.581) or hand-eye coordination (p = 0.439). Baseline visuospatial ability (3D test) was an independent predictor of final performance in camera navigation and hand-eye coordination (both p < 0.01). Positive correlations were found between 3D scores and CN (r = 0.397) and HE (r = 0.390), as well as between 2HAND and HE (r = 0.341).
conclusionsBihemispheric tDCS applied during laparoscopic simulation selectively enhanced acquisition of bimanual coordination, while performance in camera navigation and hand-eye coordination was primarily determined by baseline visuospatial ability. These findings support a task-specific role for neuromodulation as an adjunct to simulation-based laparoscopic training and highlight the importance of visuospatial profiling for personalized training strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.