ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Pilot development with preliminary validation of a skills suturing score: essential suturing skills.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSuturing skills are paramount for all surgeons. To date, there is no unified validated score that correlates with basic suturing abilities. We sought to develop and validate a score (Essential Suturing Skills-ESS) to evaluate basic suturing performance.
methodsThe ESS testing comprises two exercises. The applicant performs seven simple interrupted stitches in a dedicated foam base and follows with a running suture in a carpet-like material (seven throws). The time to perform the sutures and the surgical skills were compiled and combined through a novel mathematical equation, thus generating the ESS score. Fourth-year medical students (before and after 30 h of training), general surgery residents, and surgeons (control group) performed the ESS tasks. The evaluations were blinded. In the ESS score, a lower number indicates a better performance.
resultsSixty-two medical students (43 females), six general surgery residents, and eight surgeons have performed the ESS. The mean ESS score of the surgeons was 4.14 (± 0.45). The students had a 9.15 (± 2.10) ESS score before training and a 6.29 (± 0.98) after 30 h of training. The general surgery residents ESS score was (6.04 ± 0.91). The differences between the surgeons and students both before (p < 0.001) and after training were statistically significant (p < 0.0001). The improvement of the ESS score of the students after training was also significant (p < 0.0001). The residents had a similar performance compared with the students after training (p = 0.536) and significantly worse compared with the professors (p = 0.0002). Each evaluation took about 20 min to be completed.
conclusionIn this pilot validation study, the ESS score correlated well with suturing performance, with clear discrimination between medical students, residents, and surgeons. It is low cost and simple to perform and evaluate. Future developments include a pass/fail score, cognitive testing, and automated evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.