ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Feasibility of using artificial intelligence models to identify the obturator nerve in laparoscopic selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProtecting the obturator nerve (ON) is crucial during selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (SLPLND). This study evaluated the feasibility of an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted system for real-time intraoperative identification of the ON in laparoscopic surgery.
methodsThis study retrospectively analyzed surgical video from 30 patients who underwent laparoscopic SLPLND between June 2023 and December 2024. The obturator nerves in selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection videos were analyzed using FDIM HoloSurg software. The panel of experts consisted of three senior surgeons with extensive experience in SLPLND, who analyzed the videos and scored them using a Likert scale (0, very poor; 1, poor; 2, acceptable; 3, good; and 4, excellent).
resultsThis research successfully established a real-time obturator nerve recognition model based on YOLOv11. The model was trained and validated using a dataset consisting of 1,530 high-quality surgical images, which were divided into training and validation sets at a ratio of 7:3. It achieved an overall accuracy of 0.962, a precision of 0.781, a recall of 0.775, and an F1 score of 0.778. Thirty challenging scenarios were selected from the validation cohort. In the vast majority of cases (73.3%), this model achieved an excellent score, while the scores obtained by junior surgeons were generally lower (P < 0.001).
conclusionThis study confirms the technical feasibility of an AI-based real-time system for assisting in the identification of the ON. The system demonstrates a balance between high recall and precision, which can assist junior surgeons in identifying the ON and enhancing surgical safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42443674What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.