Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42443665›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of ageing2026

Is there a pension penalty for late-career family caregiving in Germany? The role of pension care credits and employment career.

Ulrike Ehrlich, Nadiya Kelle, Alberto Lozano Alcántara, Laura Romeu Gordo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of ageing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ulrike EhrlichGerman Centre of Gerontology (DZA), Berlin, Germany. ulrike.ehrlich@dza.de.
Nadiya KelleGerman Centre of Gerontology (DZA), Berlin, Germany.
Alberto Lozano AlcántaraGerman Centre of Gerontology (DZA), Berlin, Germany.
Laura Romeu GordoGerman Centre of Gerontology (DZA), Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unpaid care for ill, disabled, or frail older family members (hereafter 'family care') is most common in late career. Because caregiving can be difficult to reconcile with paid work, it may reduce pension contribution records and later-life financial well-being. Many European countries therefore provide pension care credits, yet eligibility is selective and many caregivers remain uncredited. Against this background, we examine how late-career pension accumulation differs between non-caregivers, credited caregivers, and uncredited caregivers across different late-career employment trajectories. Detailed information on pensions, family care and employment of individuals between the ages of 55 and 65 (N = 814), covering those born between 1946 and 1955, is derived from SOEP-RV, a novel data linkage of administrative records of the German pension insurance (RV) with the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP, waves 2001-2020). By means of linear regressions, preceded by sequence and cluster analyses to typify late-career employment trajectories, we found no statistically significant associations between uncredited low-intensity care and lower pension accumulation. Uncredited high-intensity caregivers accumulate fewer pension entitlements within full-time and part-time trajectories. Moreover, credited caregivers accumulate more pension entitlements than non-caregivers, but only within part-time, homemaking, and early retirement trajectories. These findings suggest that the German pension care credit scheme provides selective and uneven compensation and that uncredited high-intensity caregivers tend to face pension penalties.

Indexed as

Employment trajectoriesFamily careLate careerLife coursePension entitlements

Identifiers

PMID42443665
PMCPMC13365077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.