ReviewClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2026
Nanoparticle radiosensitizers in cancer radiotherapy: bridging preclinical promise and clinical reality.
Review in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nanoparticle radiosensitizers have attracted considerable attention in radiation oncology owing to their capacity to enhance the therapeutic ratio of radiotherapy. Metal-based, biodegradable, and multifunctional composite nanoparticles exploit high atomic number elements to amplify local radiation dose deposition, generate reactive oxygen species, and modulate the tumor microenvironment. Preclinical studies have consistently demonstrated improved tumor control with reduced normal tissue toxicity across multiple experimental models. However, the trajectory from laboratory discovery to clinical adoption remains slow and platform-dependent. This critical review systematically examines the mechanistic landscape of nanoparticle radiosensitization, encompassing physical dose enhancement, oxidative stress-mediated damage, DNA repair interference, cell cycle modulation, hypoxia reversal, and immune activation. We then evaluate major nanoparticle classes through a translational lens, explicitly distinguishing platforms that have reached prospective clinical testing-most notably hafnium dioxide nanoparticles (NBTXR3/Hensify)-from those still confined to preclinical investigation. Key translational barriers are analyzed, including challenges in tumor-specific biodistribution, long-term toxicity, scalable manufacturing with batch consistency, and regulatory qualification. A comparative framework is provided to help readers assess the readiness level of different nanoplatforms. Rather than offering an exhaustive catalog of published studies, this review aims to identify critical roadblocks and prioritize research directions that can accelerate meaningful clinical deployment of nanoparticle radiosensitizers in cancer radiotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42443664What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.