Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42443618›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of pediatrics2026

Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Genetics: Current Applications and Challenges.

Rohit Sadanand, Neerja Gupta

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rohit SadanandDivison of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Neerja GuptaDivison of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. neerja17aiims@aiims.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7108-1974

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiomics, next-generation, and long-read sequencing approaches have transformed the practice of medical genetics. Complex cases often require several person-hours to make sense of the tens of thousands to millions of variants and biochemical patterns in each patient. Availability of massive datasets challenges traditional analytical and interpretive approaches. Artificial intelligence offers powerful ways to handle the growing volume and complexity of genomic and phenotypic data in clinical genetics. It is already influencing several areas of practice, including variant prioritization and interpretation, rare disease screening, and aspects of precision medicine. However, translating these advances into routine clinical use has proven difficult due to the underrepresentation of various populations, ethical issues, and issues related to data governance. As the majority of these tools are used in isolation, separate from hospital information systems and routine reporting pipelines, they are not optimally utilized. With continued progress in precision medicine and genomics, these AI genomic tools are likely to be integrated more into medical genetics practice, rather than remaining restricted to specialised or experimental settings.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceGenetics, MedicalGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPrecision MedicineArtificial intelligenceClinical geneticsDeep learningElectronic health recordsNext-generation sequencingPrecision medicineRare disease diagnosisVariant interpretation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.