Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42443588›Full record

ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2026

Automated Cytoplasmic Image Analysis System for Non-invasive Oocyte Quality Screening Workflow Using Static Bright-Field Images.

Takashi Morimoto, Hidehiko Matsubayashi, Takumi Takeuchi, Tomomoto Ishikawa, Ryo Haraguchi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Takashi MorimotoGraduate School of Information Science, University of Hyogo, 7-1-28, Minatojimaminami-Machi, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, 650-0047, Japan. tmorimoto0619@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9515-1033
Hidehiko MatsubayashiDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Reproduction Clinic Tokyo, Shiodome City Center 3 F, 1-5-2 Higashi-Shimbashi, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, 105-7103, Japan.
Takumi TakeuchiDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Reproduction Clinic Tokyo, Shiodome City Center 3 F, 1-5-2 Higashi-Shimbashi, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, 105-7103, Japan.
Tomomoto IshikawaDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Reproduction Clinic Tokyo, Shiodome City Center 3 F, 1-5-2 Higashi-Shimbashi, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, 105-7103, Japan.
Ryo HaraguchiGraduate School of Information Science, University of Hyogo, 7-1-28, Minatojimaminami-Machi, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, 650-0047, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To determine whether a pre-trained deep neural network (ResNet50) can non-invasively evaluate oocyte quality and predict subsequent embryonic development by extracting cytoplasmic features from static bright-field images acquired immediately before piezo-intracytoplasmic sperm injection. This prospective cohort study included 306 metaphase II oocytes obtained from 63 patients (73 cycles). Immediately before piezo-intracytoplasmic sperm injection, spindle visibility was scored using PolScope, and static bright-field images were acquired. The cytoplasmic regions were automatically segmented and fed into a pre-trained ResNet50 model to extract intermediate layer features from layers 1 and 3. The resulting feature vectors were reduced to 20 components via principal component analysis. Logistic regression and support vector machines with stratified five-fold cross-validation were used to evaluate classification performance for spindle presence, normal fertilization, blastocyst formation, and high-quality blastocyst rates. Single ResNet-derived features were assessed individually. Logistic regression principal component analysis of 20 components achieved an area under the curve of 0.679 for spindle detection (sensitivity: 84.2%; specificity: 45.5%) and 0.521 for fertilization (sensitivity: 92.8%; specificity: 18.8%). Our support vector machine yielded marginal improvements. Single-feature analysis demonstrated high specificity for spindle detection (area under the curve, 0.656; specificity, 93.9%) and moderate specificity for fertilization (area under the curve, 0.607; specificity, 81.2%). Blastocyst prediction remained limited (area under the curve ≤ 0.64). Spindle-negative oocytes exhibited markedly better fertilization prediction (area under the curve, 0.835; specificity, 81.8%). Our deep neural network-based automated cytoplasmic image analysis system quantitatively and non-invasively assessed oocyte maturity without requiring large training datasets and predicted subsequent fertilization.

Indexed as

CytoplasmImage Processing, Computer-AssistedOocytesConvolutional Neural NetworksFemaleHumansProspective StudiesSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicWorkflowDeep learningFertilization predictionNon-invasive imagingOocyte qualitySpindle detection

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.