ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026
Immediate creation of spelling expectations during explicit versus implicit auditory word learning.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When learning novel spoken words, literate children and adults have been shown to generate preliminary orthographic representations (orthographic skeletons) before seeing the words' spellings. This process seems to occur even when multiple spellings are possible (e.g., in Spanish a novel word /bapu/ can be spelled < bapu > or < vapu >). Here, we investigate whether orthographic skeletons are generated any time a novel word is learned or only during explicit word learning. Ninety-six Spanish-speaking adults learned novel spoken Spanish words with one (consistent words) or two possible spellings (inconsistent words) either through explicit training (explicit learners) or implicit training (implicit learners). Immediately after training, both groups read the novel words embedded in sentences in a self-paced reading task. The results showed differences in reading times for words learned through explicit versus implicit instruction: explicit learners read recently acquired words with one spelling faster than those with two spellings only when the latter were presented in the unpreferred spelling option. This suggests that explicit learners generated orthographic skeletons as a result of aural training. No differences in reading times for words with different spellings were observed in implicit learners. We conclude that generating orthographic skeletons during auditory word learning is not automatic and unconscious.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42443514What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.