Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42443423›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026

The Blending Technique: A New Approach for Tear Trough Correction.

Javier Beut, Eva Guisantes, Glenn W Jelks, Elizabeth B Jelks, Chin-Ho Wong

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Javier BeutDirector of the Academy of Continuing Medical Education (ACME), Beut Institute, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Eva GuisantesDepartment of Surgery and Surgical Specialties, University of Barcelona, Hospital of Terrassa, Crta/ Torrebonica s/n, 08227, Barcelona, Spain. draguisantes@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1546-1849
Glenn W JelksHansjorg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, Department of Ophthalmology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Elizabeth B JelksJelksMedical, New York, NY, USA.
Chin-Ho WongW Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Plastic Surgery Department, Mount Elizabeth Novena Specialist Center, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe tear trough is one of the areas that most reflects aging. The anatomy of the preseptal, premaxillary, prezygomatic and deep pyriform spaces are essential for successful planning of filler treatments. MATERIAL AND TECHNIQUE: This work analyzes the anatomic relationship between the origin of the orbital septum and the tear trough/ orbicularis retaining ligaments, and between the anatomical spaces and the cheek fat compartments, to classify patients who undergo a filler treatment for tear trough deformity. Patients are classified in 'innie' or 'outie' and blending technique is described based on this classification.

resultsA total of 38 patients were evaluated, comprising 21 females and 17 males, with a mean age of 53 years (range, 31-72 years). The mean follow-up period was 10.4 months (range, 5-22 months). All patients presented with an innie-type tear trough deformity. Prior to treatment, 76.3% of patients (n = 29) were classified as Hirmand Type II, and 23.7% (n = 9) as Type III. Following treatment, 84.2% (n = 32) of patients were rated as "very much improved" (GAIS score of 1), and 15.8% (n = 6) as "much improved" (GAIS score of 2). The mean volume of hyaluronic acid injected per unilateral tear trough was 0.35 cc (range of 0.2-0.5 cc), and for the unilateral midcheek was 0.65 cc (range of 0.5 to 2 cc). No complications were reported.

conclusionThe blending technique is an effective technique to improve the appearance of the lid-cheek junction, correcting the TT deformity and the palpebromalar groove. Patients are classified as innies or outies based on the position of the AM on the orbital bone. Innie patients are more favorable to the injection of HA in the gap between AM and ORL (preseptal space) to correct the TT groove. Outie patients benefit from the volumization and support of the DMCFP, but not from direct injection into the TT and preseptal space. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Beut techniqueBlending techniqueInnieLid-cheek junctionOutiePeriorbital rejuvenationTear trough correctionTear trough deformityTear trough fillers

Identifiers

PMID42443423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.