Observational studyAesthetic plastic surgery2026
The Rise of Social Media Websites: How Plastic Surgeons Interact with Patients in the Digital Age, a Multicenter Study of China.
Observational study in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn the digital age, the internet has become a major source of health information for patients considering aesthetic surgery. Given that most cosmetic procedures are elective rather than medically necessary, patients often have sufficient time to search for information and develop expectations before seeking professional consultation. This study aimed to investigate how internet use influences patients' preoperative decision-making, expectations, and postoperative satisfaction, while also identifying practical strategies for plastic surgeons to improve patient communication through online platforms.
methodsWe conducted a multicenter, prospective observational study involving patients undergoing aesthetic plastic surgery. Preoperative and postoperative questionnaires were administered to evaluate patients' sources of information, surgical preferences, expectations, and satisfaction. In addition, we analyzed user engagement characteristics of the most popular Chinese social media platforms for cosmetic surgery information to explore factors contributing to their influence on patient decision-making.
resultsThe internet significantly influenced patients' preoperative decision-making and increased the likelihood that patients developed specific surgical preferences before their first consultation (both p 0.0001). Internet users also reported significantly higher preoperative satisfaction with their eyes than clinicians' assessments (p 0.02); however, their satisfaction was significantly lower seven days after surgery compared with both non-internet users and clinicians' assessments (p ≤ 0.02). Analysis of the most popular Chinese social media platforms demonstrated that RedNote exhibited significantly greater user interaction than TikTok. Furthermore, patients were significantly more willing to ask questions on RedNote (p = 0.01), facilitating more active communication between users.
conclusionInternet-based information substantially influences patients' preoperative decision-making, expectations, and short-term postoperative satisfaction. As online platforms continue to shape patients' perceptions of aesthetic surgery, plastic surgeons may benefit from establishing a stronger social media presence and actively responding to patient inquiries. Such engagement could help optimize patient education, better align expectations with achievable outcomes, and ultimately improve the consultation experience and patient satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
42443416What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.