ArticleHeredity2026
Modeling breeding programs considering social behavior in large groups of farmed fish.
Article in Heredity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breeding programs are essential in aquaculture, improving economically and environmentally important traits. In aquaculture systems, animals are raised in large groups, where social interactions are frequent and can influence individual performance. In these circumstances, indirect genetic effects can play an important role in the response to selection, and consequently, their effects on selection outcomes must be analyzed. This study aimed to evaluate the implications of heterogeneous social interaction effects on fish breeding programs using stochastic simulations. We simulated a fish breeding program with 2000 selection candidates from 1000 families formed by a partial mating design of 100 males and 100 females. Social interactions were simulated, affected by the target phenotype and two latent-personality traits. We investigated how genetic gains and phenotypic variances are affected by the magnitude and direction of social interaction effects on the target phenotype, different selection strategies, and the genetic correlations between the target phenotype and personality traits. Our results showed that increased social interaction effects lead to greater phenotypic variability in the target trait. Under mass selection, the genetic means of personality traits change, and these changes depend on the strength and direction of genetic correlations between the focal and personality traits. To achieve similar genetic gain under group selection, many groups with few families are needed. Phenotypic variability of the target trait and genetic means of the personality traits remain constant under group selection. However, this strategy increases the rate of inbreeding per generation, but in a similar amount across the different group designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.