ArticleScientific reports2026
SLA-printed nanographite-reinforced UV-curable resin composites for dental applications.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates stereolithography (SLA)-printed nanographite (NG)-reinforced UV-curable resin composites for dental applications. Anycubic plant-based resin was modified with 0, 0.5, 1, 3, and 5 wt% NG and evaluated for viscosity, UV absorbance, moisture content, water absorption, gel content, tensile, flexural, hardness, and microstructural behavior. The viscosity remained suitable for printing, decreasing slightly from 139 mPa·s for the control to 134 mPa·s at 5% NG. The 1% NG composite showed the best overall performance, with the highest tensile strength (20 MPa), compared to 18 MPa for the control, and the highest flexural stress (50 MPa) and Shore D hardness (72). The control hardness was 70, while 5% NG dropped to 59. Gel content decreased from 99.86% (control) to 99.24% (5% NG), but higher loadings increased moisture and water uptake. Microscopy and SEM confirmed that 1% NG produced the most uniform morphology, whereas 3-5% NG showed agglomeration and defects. The results demonstrate that the controlled addition of NG enhances the mechanical performance of SLA-printed UV-curable resin composites, indicating their potential for provisional dental prosthetics applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.