ArticleScientific reports2026
Temporal context shapes multicue integration in auditory time-to-contact judgments.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anticipating when a moving object will arrive is fundamental for action. While vision-based time-to-contact (TTC) judgment follows reliability-weighted integration of motion and duration cues, it remains unclear whether audition supports similar computations. We asked listeners to judge TTC for moving sounds in motion-only, duration-only, and combined cue conditions, under fast and slow temporal contexts. Combined cues consistently improved precision, but temporal context reshaped bias. Indeed, integration generates remarkable delays in the fast regime and reduced anticipatory errors in the slow regime. Regression-to-the-mean effects revealed strong influences of context-dependent priors. A hierarchical model further suggested that adjusted cue weights in a manner broadly consistent with reliability-based cue use, while deviations from the flat-prior benchmark indicated that temporal context and priors shaped performance. These results indicate that auditory TTC is not a fixed computation, but an adaptive inference process shaped by temporal context, revealing a modality-specific route to predictive timing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.