ArticleScientific reports2026
FLASH effect tissue sparing comparison for X-ray, hadron, and VHEE irradiation modalities.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
FLASH-RT is an irradiation modality using Ultra-High-Dose-Rates, where a healthy tissue sparing effect is observed. Different particle types have distinct characteristics in lateral and distal dose deposition, which can affect the amount of healthy tissue sparing by the FLASH effect. However, few comparative studies investigate this impact. In this Monte Carlo-based study, we compare different irradiation modalities in a simple geometrical model and demonstrate how dose, dose-rate, and particle type influence the volume of healthy tissue benefiting from FLASH. The results indicate that less conformal modalities, such as X-rays and VHEE, benefit more from the effect than hadrons. Despite this, FLASH X-rays and FLASH VHEE still deposit higher dose to healthy tissue than conventional hadrons. Assuming a FLASH-triggering dose threshold and dose-rate threshold from literature, we found that hadrons require a target dose of 20 Gy and target dose-rate of 75 Gy/s to achieve healthy tissue sparing, about twice as high as for VHEE and X-rays. The results imply that highly fractionated treatments cannot be applied under current assumptions of FLASH-triggering dose and dose-rate thresholds. Future studies using clinical dose distributions could explore the use of multiple angles, fractionation possibilities, and relative biological effectiveness (RBE) for more specific clinical cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.