ArticleNature communications2026
A tumor profiling resource for ovarian cancer: insights into chemotherapy-driven heterogeneity and personalized treatment strategy.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A tumor profiling resource for ovarian cancer: insights into chemotherapy-driven heterogeneity and personalized treatment strategy.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
54 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer, chemotherapy remains the primary standard treatment, despite growing recognition of the disease as highly heterogeneous. Here, we examine the feasibility and clinical utility of comprehensive multimodal molecular profiling to inform treatment decisions. We analyze blood, single-cell and bulk tumor tissue, and malignant ascites using up to eleven technologies (DNA, RNA, protein, and functional assays) within a four-week turnaround time. Hypothetical treatment recommendations are altered for 76% of patients, and multi-omics-guided maintenance therapy is associated with prolonged overall survival in a subset of patients. Subsequent cohort analysis reveals distinct cellular and molecular profiles in ascites-derived single-cells compared to solid tumor tissue, unique per-patient ex vivo drug responses, and a marked increase in cancer cell heterogeneity following chemotherapy exposure. This coincides with genomic signature alterations in whole-genome-amplified patients. Our data suggest that molecularly guided treatments should be tested as adjuvant therapies prior to chemotherapy in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.