Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42443176›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Surface circumferential spinal cord recording in freely moving rodents.

Salim El Hadwe, Ruben Ruiz-Mateos Serrano, George Psaltakis, Margaux Forner, Chaeyeon Lee, Sydney Swedick, Anton Banta, Xueer Zhang, Moleca Ghannam, Tawfique Hasan and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Salim El HadweElectrical Engineering Division, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5521-524X
Ruben Ruiz-Mateos SerranoElectrical Engineering Division, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8501-7068
George PsaltakisCambridge Graphene Centre, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Margaux FornerElectrical Engineering Division, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Chaeyeon LeeElectrical Engineering Division, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7633-2448
Sydney SwedickElectrical Engineering Division, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-7061-8777
Anton BantaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Xueer ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Moleca GhannamElectrical Engineering Division, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Tawfique HasanCambridge Graphene Centre, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6250-7582
Alejandro Carnicer-LombarteElectrical Engineering Division, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. acarnice@cityu.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5650-4692
George G MalliarasElectrical Engineering Division, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. gm603@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4582-8501
Damiano G BaroneElectrical Engineering Division, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. dgbarone@houstonmethodist.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0091-385X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord injury affects over 2.5 million people worldwide, yet current neuroprosthetic strategies remain fragmented, addressing motor, sensory, or autonomic function in isolation. Here we show that a single ultrathin circumferential electrode array, conforming to the spinal cord without penetrating neural tissue, can simultaneously decode motor intent, classify sensory inputs, and discriminate visceral sensory inputs. In freely moving rats during short-term implantation (up to three days), deep learning decoders achieved robust motor intent decoding (R² = 0.97) by exploiting low-frequency spinal oscillations aligned with central pattern generator rhythms. The same interface classified eight sensory modalities with 94.4% accuracy. In acutely anaesthetized pigs, cross-species validation confirmed translational scalability and reliably distinguished visceral sensory inputs. Uniquely, the two-row electrode configuration resolved directional propagation within spinal tracts while electrode-dense one-row devices enabled high-precision intraspinal source localization. By consolidating motor, sensory, and visceral afferent decoding within a single conformal interface, this approach positions the spinal cord as a target for multifunctional neuroprosthetic interfacing, offering a path toward integrated restoration of physiological function after neurological injury.

Indexed as

Spinal CordAnimalsElectrodes, ImplantedFemaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySpinal Cord InjuriesSwine

Identifiers

PMID42443176
PMCPMC13487197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.