ArticleNature communications2026
From data chaos to physically interpretable deterministic mapping.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From data chaos to physically interpretable deterministic mapping.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Discovering governing equations directly from observational data remains a fundamental challenge in science and engineering, particularly when measurements are noisy, high-dimensional, or multi-scale. Existing approaches often cast equation discovery as a regression problem that selects candidate terms to fit observed trajectories, which can limit structural stability and identifiability under realistic data conditions. We propose a structured operator-learning framework that reformulates equation discovery as a constrained dynamical inference problem integrating spectral decomposition, physics-guided sparse projection, and cross-view consistency regularization within a unified architecture. By decomposing dynamics into scale-resolved components and enforcing invariance across perturbed observations, the framework promotes stable and interpretable equation recovery. Here, we show that the method consistently identifies compact governing equations while maintaining strong long-horizon predictive accuracy across canonical nonlinear systems and representative industrial processes, even under noisy and distribution-shifted data.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.