ArticleNature communications2026
Racial and economic disparities in coastal access and engagement mediate the ocean's contribution to human wellbeing.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding what shapes ocean access and its contribution to human wellbeing is critical for equitable and sustainable marine resource management. Using a community-engaged research approach, we examine responses from 1691 surveys administered across central California (USA), an iconic coastline renowned for its biodiversity and cultural significance, to explore the factors mediating ocean use and benefits. We find that a) the ocean's subjective and relational contributions to human wellbeing outweighed material contributions; and b) these benefits are constrained for vulnerable communities and underserved populations by personal (e.g., lack of interest or affordability), physical-environmental (e.g., lack of infrastructure or exposure to pollution), and knowledge (e.g., how to safely and legally engage) barriers. Our results highlight how structural exclusion from ocean spaces limits wellbeing for marginalized groups, a critical feedback loop that may perpetuate inequality and degrade public health. Though California considers itself a world leader in ocean management, our findings indicate that there is more work to be done and offer actionable insight for advancing more inclusive and equity-centered approaches to coastal and ocean governance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.