ArticleDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2026
Safety Profile of Tirzepatide in Real-World Clinical Practice: A Pharmacovigilance Study Using the FAERS Database.
Article in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Safety Profile of Tirzepatide in Real-World Clinical Practice: A Pharmacovigilance Study Using the FAERS Database.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTirzepatide, a first-in-class dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist, was approved by the FDA for type 2 diabetes mellitus (2022) and chronic weight management (2023). Despite superior efficacy in trials, its real-world safety profile remains incompletely characterised. This study aimed to characterise tirzepatide's post-marketing safety signals using the FAERS database. MATERIALS AND
methodsFAERS reports listing tirzepatide as the primary suspected drug were extracted (Q2 2022-Q4 2025). Disproportionality analysis used four algorithms (ROR, PRR, IC, EBGM). Adverse events were coded using MedDRA terminology. Time-to-onset and comparative analyses versus semaglutide were conducted.
resultsA total of 123 145 reports (251 435 individual adverse events) were included. Females accounted for 62.30%, with a mean age of 53.7 years. Major signals included medication errors, injection-site reactions and gastrointestinal disorders. Novel unlabelled signals included eructation, hunger, food craving and starvation ketoacidosis. Compared with semaglutide, tirzepatide showed lower reporting odds of vomiting, constipation and decreased appetite. Among reports with valid onset data, median time to onset was 13 days, with 67.1% occurring within 30 days.
conclusionsThis FAERS study characterises tirzepatide safety signals in real-world practice. Medication errors and injection-site reactions were the strongest signals. Several novel signals warrant further investigation. Among reports with complete onset data, most adverse events were reported early after treatment initiation, suggesting the importance of closer monitoring during the first month of therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.