Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42443099›Full record

ArticleFamily process2026

Caring for Chosen Family: A Scoping Review of Clinical Work With Chosen Family.

Ainsley Jenicek, Miles Cooke, Heather B MacIntosh, Tamara Sussman, Aline Bogossian

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Family process, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ainsley JenicekSchool of Social Work, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9982-0734
Miles CookeSchool of Social Work, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Heather B MacIntoshSchool of Social Work, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4932-2097
Tamara SussmanSchool of Social Work, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1226-6450
Aline BogossianÉcole de Travail Social, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9816-5887

Funding

Fonds de recherche du Québec 307543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This scoping review provides an overview of empirical research and practice-based literature that addresses direct clinical practice with chosen families-familial relationships that are not based on biology or law. Given the prevalence of chosen family among sexual and gender minorities as well as the amount of research that underlines chosen family as an important social support, this paper aims to synthesize recommendations for clinical work with chosen families and to highlight gaps in the literature. Using the five-step Arksey and O'Malley (2005) scoping review process, four electronic databases were systematically searched to identify papers that address working with chosen family in care-related fields, including social work, couple and family therapy, and nursing. Twenty-seven articles were included in this review and seven themes were identified by these authors that culminated in recommendations for clinical practice: (a) educate oneself about diverse family forms and address biases; (b) invite self-definition of "family"; (c) proactively include chosen family; (d) consider legal and policy barriers; (e) refer chosen family members to sources of support; (f) encourage people to create or maintain chosen family; and (g) engage in sexual and gender minority affirmative practices generally. The existing literature focuses primarily on individual services that involve chosen family as needed, but do not explicitly focus on dynamic and systemic needs. Further research into systemic work with chosen family is needed.

Indexed as

FamilyFamily RelationsFamily TherapyHumansSexual and Gender MinoritiesSocial Supportcare serviceschosen familyclinical practicescoping review

Identifiers

PMID42443099
PMCPMC13364724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.