ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2026
Hospitalization for Malignant Arrhythmias Following Initiation of Donepezil: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hospitalization for Malignant Arrhythmias Following Initiation of Donepezil: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLimited evidence suggests donepezil might pose an increased risk of malignant arrhythmias. We examined whether donepezil initiation was associated with a higher risk of hospitalization for malignant arrhythmia compared to other acetylcholinesterase inhibitors.
methodsPopulation-based cohort study using linked administrative databases from seven Canadian provinces (BC, AB, SK, MB, ON, PEI, NL). We included individuals aged ≥ 66 who were new users of donepezil, galantamine, or rivastigmine from April 1st, 2011, to January 31st, 2019. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate the risk of hospitalization for malignant arrhythmia among new donepezil users compared to new users of galantamine or rivastigmine.
resultsWe identified 162 616 subjects (mean age 82, 40% male). Most (127 103; 78%) were treated with donepezil, while 25 597 (15.7%) received galantamine, (n = 6541; 4.0%) received oral rivastigmine, and (n = 3375; 2.1%) received transdermal rivastigmine. The median age was 82 years, and 59.8% were women. Baseline characteristics were generally well balanced. During a median follow-up of 386 days (maximum 2616 days), we identified 90 hospitalizations for malignant arrhythmias, including 58 in the donepezil group (23 per 100 000 person-years) and 32 for other AChEIs (44 per 100 000 person-years). Cumulative incidence curves showed a lower risk among donepezil initiators (Log-Rank p = 0.0026; Wilcoxon p = 0.0008). Crude regression suggested a reduced hazard (HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.34-0.80), which persisted after adjustment (aHR 0.55; 95% CI 0.36-0.85). In drug-specific analyses, donepezil initiators had a lower hazard relative to galantamine (aHR 0.49; 95% CI 0.31-0.77) but not rivastigmine (aHR 0.90; 95% CI 0.36-2.27). Sensitivity analyses-including alternative diagnosis field definitions, restricted follow-up, modified exclusion criteria, and propensity score adjustment-yielded consistent findings. No clear dose-response pattern was observed for any AChEI.
conclusionIn this population-based cohort study, initiation of donepezil was not associated with an increased risk of malignant arrhythmias compared to initiation of galantamine or rivastigmine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.